Pourquoi évaluer ?

PDF version

The purpose of evaluation is not always clear, particularly for those who have watched surveys conducted, data entered, and then the ensuing reports  filed away  only to collect dust. This is most common when evaluations are imposed by others.

If, on the other hand, those responsible for the day-to-day operations of a program have critical questions, evaluations can help find answers.  As an example, the NGO responsible for distributing chlorine pills may speak with their local field staff and hear stories of households diligently using the pills, and occasionally see improvements in their health. But each time it rains heavily, the clinics fill up with people suffering from diarrheal diseases. The NGO might wonder, “if people are using chlorine to treat their water, why are they getting sick when it rains? Even if the water is more contaminated, the chlorine should kill all the bacteria.” The NGO may wonder whether the chlorine pills are indeed effective at killing bacteria.  Are people using it in the right proportion? Maybe our field staff is not telling us the truth. Perhaps the intended beneficiaries are not using the pills.  Perhaps they aren’t even receiving them.  And then when confronted with this fact, the field staff claims that during the rains it is difficult to reach households and distribute pills. Households, on the other hand, will reply that they most diligently use pills during the rains, and that the pills have helped them substantially.

Speaking to individuals at different levels of the organization as well as to stakeholders can uncover many stories of what is going on. These stories can be the basis for theories. But plausible explanations are not the same thing as answers. Evaluations involve developing hypotheses of what’s going on, and then testing those hypotheses.