Where evidence meets practice: Inside UNICEF and J-PAL’s FLN Academy 3.0
This is the first blog in a series exploring how UNICEF and J-PAL are working together to strengthen evidence use in education. In this post, we highlight insights from global experts on scaling proven education interventions. The second blog turns to the local level—spotlighting how two education leaders in Ghana are applying these ideas in practice to improve student learning through data and evaluation.
To ensure that children in school learn to read for meaning and apply basic math, bringing together the best of both worlds—practical insights from those who work on the ground and synthesis of rigorous research from academic experts—is imperative.
This was the key message from Pia Britto, UNICEF’s Global Director of Education and Adolescent Development, at the launch of the Foundational Literacy and Numeracy (FLN) Academy 3.0 in September 2024. The event featured panelists Benjamin Piper (Program Director of Global Education, Gates Foundation) and Luis Benveniste (Global Director of Education, World Bank), who shared insights from their extensive careers in getting research-backed educational programs to work at scale.
FLN Academy 3.0 is a collaboration between UNICEF and J-PAL that supports UNICEF regional and country offices and local stakeholders in applying evidence-based solutions to advance foundational literacy and numeracy. Through this partnership, we bring together practitioners, policymakers, and researchers to exchange knowledge on what has worked to improve children’s learning.
These experts come together around problems of practice they all face in improving children’s basic reading and math skills, which form the foundations of all learning. We aim to work alongside local UNICEF offices and their partners to strengthen the global response to the learning crisis through the adoption and scaling of proven interventions.
“The philanthropic interest on foundational literacy and numeracy is relatively new but quite exciting, and I think it’s incumbent on us to think about how we can apply these programs at scale to reach more children.”
—Benjamin Piper, Global Education Program Director, Gates Foundation
The launch of FLN Academy 3.0 marked the beginning of a series of webinars on interventions for improving foundational learning outcomes that are recommended by the Global Education Evidence Advisory Panel in its 2023 “Smart Buys” report. Since last fall, we have hosted two webinars spotlighting Teaching at the Right Level and structured pedagogy. Both webinars offered attendees the opportunity to update their knowledge of evidence-based programs and engage with practitioners about implementation and scaling issues.
FLN Evidence: Teaching at the Right Level
Given the research-backed consensus on the effectiveness of Teaching at the Right Level and other tailored instruction models for accelerating FLN learning, session moderator John Floretta (Global Deputy Executive Director of J-PAL) focused his presentation on a story that not many people may have heard: TaRL’s successful adaptation from India to Zambia through a rigorous process of piloting and government-led scale-up. With the support of UNICEF and other partners, Zambia’s Catch-Up program has helped students make large gains in learning. Panelists Rukmini Banerji (CEO, Pratham Education Foundation), Titus Syengo (Executive Director, TaRL Africa), who has been working with 16 Africa countries to implement TARL, and Katharina Wuppinger (Chief Education, UNICEF Zambia Country Office) shared their unique perspectives as stakeholders at different phases in TaRL’s journey from piloting and evaluation to adaptation and scale-up.
“We learned in the process that it’s really the middle of the system that has to be the people that become the champions. If they feel the progress—if they feel that children are making progress—then many things will become easier.”
—Rukmini Banerji, CEO, Pratham Education Foundation
FLN Evidence: Structured Pedagogy
Isaac Mbiti (University of Virginia; co-scientific director, J-PAL Africa) presented evidence on structured pedagogy—the coordinated package of detailed teacher guides, student textbooks, and continuous teacher support—to show its cost-effectiveness in increasing student learning in different countries. He focused on two cases in Kenya and India, where structured pedagogy helped reduce inequality among students and sustain learning gains. Benjamin Piper, Permie Isaac (Head of Content and Training, Funda Wande), and Anustup Nayak (Project Director, Classroom Instruction and Practice, Central Square Foundation) had a lively discussion that spotlighted how essential it is for the success of implementing structured pedagogy to integrate efforts at every level of the education system.
“One of our key lessons is producing a product with the system rather than for the system. ‘For the system’ looks like: going away, designing a program, and then imposing it on teachers and schools. What we advocate for is collaboration right from the get-go and engaging stakeholders at every step. This ensures that whatever is being designed talks to the needs of the teachers in the system. This creates ownership, and ownership leads to better chances of implementation.”
–Permie Isaac, Head of Content and Training, Funda Wande
The upcoming webinars, scheduled throughout 2025, will focus on parental engagement interventions, educational technology, and applying generalizable research insights to a new context. For information on how to attend the webinars, contact [email protected]. You may watch recordings of all webinars at the FLN Hub.
In response to the current crisis in education and the increasing demand for actionable evidence, and with the generous support of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Douglas B. Marshall Jr. Family Foundation, and Echidna Giving, J-PAL is launching the Learning For All Initiative to identify education solutions for parents, schools, and governments.
In response to the current crisis in education and the increasing demand for actionable evidence, and with the generous support of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Douglas B. Marshall Jr. Family Foundation, and Echidna Giving, J-PAL is launching the Learning For All Initiative to identify education solutions for parents, schools, and governments. LAI will generate research in key open areas related to foundational literacy and numeracy and holistic skills, and summarize lessons for policymakers to incorporate into their decisions.
Pre-pandemic, more than half of children in low- and middle-income countries were unable to read a simple story by age 10. In the poorest countries, this figure was as high as 80 percent.
School closures, which affected over one billion children during the pandemic, have exacerbated low learning and inequity in education systems. In addition to disrupting learning, school closures deprived students of social interactions and upset routines, limiting their development of social and emotional skills.
While many countries have pursued online learning, less than half of households in low- and middle-income countries have internet access. Data also shows that school closures, reduced financial resources, and other effects of instability can disproportionately impact women and girls.
Global demand for evidence in education has rapidly increased during the pandemic recovery. In 2020, UNICEF, along with J-PAL and other partners, launched the Foundational Numeracy and Literacy Initiative to make the evidence more accessible to policymakers, while a joint effort by the World Bank, FCDO, and Building Evidence in Education (BE2) synthesized “smart buys” in education through the Global Education Evidence Advisory Panel. Post-pandemic school openings offer an ideal window for research and evidence-based action as governments develop recovery plans to ensure high-quality and equitable education for all children.
Launching the Learning for All Initiative
LAI seeks to improve global learning outcomes by uncovering the next generation of promising evidence-based approaches that can be tested, replicated, and adapted by policymakers to their local contexts. The initiative is chaired by Rachel Glennerster (University of Chicago), Karen Macours (Paris School of Economics) and Karthik Muralidharan (University of California, San Diego).
In addition to evaluating new innovations, the Initiative will also evaluate evidence-based interventions at a larger scale and in new contexts in order to better understand their generalizability, mechanisms of change, and pathways to scale.
The Initiative will achieve this through two core activities:
- Generating high-quality, rigorous studies across pre-primary, primary, and lower-secondary ages, with a focus on improving foundational literacy and numeracy and holistic skills for children in low- and middle-income countries, especially marginalized children.
- Bridging the gap between research and policy by summarizing research insights and supporting policymakers to use evidence when designing and scaling innovative education reforms to meet SDG 4 by 2030.
LAI will fund evaluations led by researchers in the J-PAL network across early childhood, primary, and lower secondary education that aim to improve student attendance or learning in five thematic areas. Priority will be given to research in sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia for thematic areas 1-4, whereas all low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) will receive equal priority for thematic area 5.
- Foundational literacy and numeracy: LAI will encourage interventions focused on improving children’s foundational literacy and numeracy. Children across low- and middle-income countries often lag below grade level in literacy and numeracy skills, and once children are far behind, it can be very difficult to catch up. Though children’s enrollment and attendance in school has improved in recent decades, more research is needed on how to best develop children’s foundational literacy and numeracy skills in and outside the classroom.
We hope to see interventions that intersect the development of foundational literacy and numeracy skills with innovative pedagogies (per thematic area 2), as well as holistic skills development (per thematic area 5). - Pedagogy: LAI seeks to understand what instructional practices are most effective for developing foundational literacy and numeracy skills in children of all ages. LAI will emphasize pedagogy as a key priority area and will prioritize research teams with experience and/or training in evaluating teaching-and-learning programs.
Pedagogical innovations may include well-known approaches such as structured pedagogy and Teaching at the Right Level (as detailed in Cost-effective Approaches to Improve Global Learning by the Global Education Evidence Advisory Panel), as well as other interventions to improve teaching and learning, including play-based learning, remedial programs, distance learning, teacher professional development, and integration of technology into curriculum. - Gender and Social Inclusion: Education inequality and marginalization appears across a range of demographic factors, including but not limited to gender, income level, location, ethnicity, race, language, citizenship status, disability, and at the intersection of those factors. The COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated the global learning crisis for all children, with adolescent girls and other marginalized groups, such as students with disabilities, at particularly high risk of not returning to school.
Even in locations that have achieved gender parity in educational attainment and learning, research suggests that girls must often achieve higher education than boys to attain equal labor outcomes and that educating girls can yield greater positive social externalities than educating men, according to the Center for Global Development’s report, Girls’ Education and Women’s Equality (2022).
We are particularly interested in supporting evaluations that aim to address how exclusion and inequality manifest locally. For example, proposals may seek to answer key open questions in girls’ education, as highlighted by the Population Council’s Girls’ Education Roadmap, including: Does engaging communities improve girls’ enrollment, attainment, and/or learning on its own? What are effective strategies to reduce school-related gender-based violence and does that improve girls’ participation and learning? How can schools address gender-inequitable environments or barriers related to menstruation, and do these interventions improve learning outcomes? Proposals may also aim to answer key questions related to other marginalization factors, such as: Which interventions designed to improve school participation and learning are most effective for students with different types of disabilities? What combination of interventions is most effective at improving education outcomes for children in extremely remote areas? - Scale-relevant work: LAI is focused on supporting projects that have carefully considered the potential implementation of a proposed intervention at scale. This includes cultivating active partnerships with governments, developing connections with local researchers and practitioners, and using these partnerships to gauge the compatibility of interventions with pre-existing in-country structures to bring ideas to scale.
- Breadth of skills: LAI will fund some projects related to a wider range of skills beyond standardized test scores in math and reading, such as cognitive thinking, creativity, and socio-emotional skills, as described in the LEGO Foundation’s white paper on Learning through play at school.
What’s next?
J-PAL is hosting a webinar to introduce LAI to policymakers, program implementers, and practitioners interested in learning how randomized evaluations could benefit education programs and about potential research partnerships with J-PAL affiliated researchers.
If you are interested in learning more about J-PAL and LAI, please register for our webinar on Wednesday, February 1, at 2:00 pm UTC.
LAI plans to work closely with a diverse group of researchers, practitioners, service providers, and policymakers that seek to improve student learning by addressing foundational literacy and numeracy, and breadth of skills. Over the next few months, we will share additional opportunities to learn more about LAI—stay tuned!
How can governments learn from evidence generated from randomized evaluations?
Over the last three years, J-PAL Africa has supported the Zambian Ministry of General Education to pilot and scale up the Catch Up Program, with the help of Pratham, Innovations for Poverty Action, UNICEF Zambia, VVOB – education for development, the USAID Zambia Mission, and USAID Development Innovation Ventures. Catch Up is a remedial education program modeled off the effectiveness of the Teaching at the Right Level (TaRL) approach but grounded in the Zambian context.
Our support to the Zambian government has been guided by a framework for how evidence can inform policy across contexts, as presented in Bates and Glennerster (2017). The framework describes how to apply evidence from one context to another by using a combination of randomized evaluations, theory, descriptive data, and process monitoring. To guide this process, it puts forward the following questions:
- What is the disaggregated theory behind the program?
- How strong is the evidence for the required general behavior change?
- Do the local conditions hold for the theory to apply?
- What is the evidence that the implementation process can be carried out well?
Teaching at the Right Level: Evidence, theory, and generalizable behavior
Several studies conducted by J-PAL affiliated researchers and others over the last twenty years on how to improve learning outcomes shed light on a key generalizable lesson in many contexts: teachers tend to teach to the top of the class.
Given the structure of education systems across many parts of the world, this is unsurprising. Many teachers are confronted with classes comprised of students with a wide variety of learning needs, dense and ambitious curricula, and high-stakes primary school leaving exams, which incentivize teachers to move at the pace of the fastest learners.
Teaching at the Right Level, an approach pioneered by Indian NGO Pratham, targets the root of this behavior. The approach groups children by homogenous learning needs; dedicates time to building basic skills rather than focusing solely on the curriculum; and regularly assesses student performance, rather than relying only on end-of-year exams.
Over the last 15 years, together Pratham and J-PAL have rigorously tested TaRL’s underlying theory of change through six randomized evaluations in India and a growing body of research in Africa, which find that when TaRL is successfully implemented, learning outcomes improve.
Catch Up: Context matters
Teaching at the Right Level is not an intervention that can be applied universally. Rather, it is an approach for working with education systems to help them adjust more flexibly to children’s needs.
Several important conditions existed in Zambia that allowed TaRL to take root:
- Zambia had a clear need for the program. Zambia ranked last in the 2011 Southern and East Africa Consortium for Monitoring Education Quality (SACMEQ) in numeracy and tied last with Malawi in literacy.
- Learning levels within each classroom are varied, and students have little recourse to learn basic skills if they have not mastered them in the foundational years.
- Education stakeholders were candid in their acknowledgment of the problem of basic skills and were open to thinking about solutions from other countries.
With support from J-PAL, the ministry chose three different evidence-based implementation models to pilot in the country.
While the evidence on TaRL is strong, it also shows how implementation failures lead to reduced impact. Before fully rolling out the program, the partner team supported the ministry to test whether the implementation could work effectively and sustainably in this new context. This work included:
- Piloting in 80 schools, with monitoring by government officials and independent monitors,
- Developing a data collection system and helping leaders react to this data, and
- Building a system of review meetings into the approach.
Given the demonstrated need for a basic skills intervention and the pilot’s implementation success, the ministry committed to scaling Catch Up to 1,800 schools by 2020. The scale-up plan includes options for iterative learning to ensure the program maintains effectiveness at scale and continues to improve over time.
Interest in Teaching at the Right Level continues to grow throughout Africa. From September 26-27, 2018, governments and organizations from across Africa interested or implementing TaRL-inspired interventions will attend a J-PAL and Pratham-hosted Teaching at the Right Level conference for the launch of the new TaRL website. The website will house useful implementation focused resources, as well as information on upcoming TaRL events and will provide a platform for those interested in TaRL to engage. The conference will provide an opportunity for the TaRL Community of Practice to share implementation lessons, strengthen design, and more effectively collaborate.
Reorienting instruction has improved learning opportunities for over 60 million students in India and Africa.
Teaching at the right level (TaRL) is an approach developed by the Indian NGO Pratham that aims to build foundational skills in math and reading for all children before exiting primary school. At the instructional level, the approach works by assessing children’s learning levels using a simple tool; grouping children based on learning levels rather than age or grade; using a range of engaging teaching and learning activities; focusing on foundational skills rather than solely on the curriculum; and tracking children’s progress.
When TaRL is implemented within government systems, Pratham helps ensure that teachers receive strong academic support through mentors who are part of the government system. Ongoing, onsite monitoring and support, as well as reviews at different levels of the school system, all contribute to the effectiveness of the program.
A series of randomized evaluations by J-PAL affiliated researchers over the past fifteen years have shown that TaRL consistently improves learning outcomes when implemented well and has led to some of the largest learning gains among rigorously evaluated education programs.1 The iterative process of innovation and evaluation in collaboration with J-PAL has helped Pratham to refine and adapt TaRL over time, which has now reached millions of children in India and Africa.
The Problem
Children around the world are in school but not learning.
Most low- and middle-income countries have dramatically increased access to schooling in recent years. However, record high enrollment rates have often not translated into improvements in learning for all students. For example, in rural India, enrollment rates in primary schools were over 96 percent in 2018, but only half of children in grade five could read a grade two level text and 52 percent could correctly do a numerical two-digit subtraction problem with borrowing–a skill that children are expected to have by the end of grade two.2 Similarly low learning levels exist in Sub-Saharan Africa: in 2015, only 40 percent of grade five students in Uganda could read a grade two level text in the local language.3
School systems in India and other countries are not always designed to address the evolving needs of students, many of whom may be the first in their families to attend school. In practice, many national curricula target only the top students and fail to provide support to the majority of children who fall behind. Factors at school and at home contribute to this problem.
School-level factors:
- Schools are usually organized by age and grade, with children progressing into the next grade regardless of learning levels.
- Teachers are expected to complete the prescribed curriculum, which becomes more and more difficult each year.
- There is often no system in place to assess children’s progress or foundational skills in early years in primary school.
- School systems often do not provide learning support to children who fall behind.
At-home factors:
- Many children come from families where parents have had little schooling and cannot provide learning support even though their aspirations for children’s educational attainment can be high.
- Children have not had any preschool exposure.
The Research
Pratham’s Teaching at the Right Level has consistently produced large and cost-effective gains in learning outcomes.
Pratham, one of India’s largest education NGOs, developed Teaching at the Right Level (TaRL) in the early 2000s to provide a solution to this particular problem. At the instructional level, children are assessed using a simple tool and then grouped according to their learning level rather than their age or grade. Instructors teach each group starting from what children already know. This approach works best with children in grade three or older because they have some experience in school and are prepared for the activities. For each group, there are activities and simple materials designed for helping that group move ahead. There are activities that children do in big groups, small groups and individually.
As a combined result of these elements, children can progress quickly to the next group. Throughout the entire process, teachers assess their pupils’ progress through ongoing, simple measurement of their ability to read and do basic arithmetic. TaRL classes break free of the “chalk and talk” practices commonly found in primary school classrooms across the world by using engaging, fun, and creative activities focused on building foundational reading and mathematics skills.
Since 2001, J-PAL affiliated researchers—Abhijit Banerjee (MIT), James Berry (University of Georgia), Shawn Cole (Harvard Business School), Esther Duflo (MIT), Leigh Linden (University of Texas Austin)—and colleagues—Rukmini Banerji, Rachel Glennerster, Harini Kannan, Stuti Khemani, Shobhini Mukherji, Marc Shotland, and Michael Walton—have partnered with Pratham to evaluate the TaRL approach for scale. This process began with early proof of concept evaluations that showed the effectiveness of TaRL and continued with subsequent iterations to understand the effectiveness of different delivery models when implemented by village volunteers, Pratham instructors, and government school-teachers.
Six randomized evaluations in seven states of India show that the TaRL approach is consistently effective when implemented systematically and has led to some of the largest effect sizes rigorously measured in the education literature. For example, the TaRL Learning Camps in Uttar Pradesh doubled the number of children who could read a paragraph or story. The long-term partnership between J-PAL and Pratham demonstrates how findings from an evaluation can provide important inputs for continuously evolving the program which in turn is rigorously evaluated.
One key learning from decades of research is that TaRL works best as a holistic approach that reorients education systems towards focusing on learning outcomes especially for foundational learning. The series of evaluations in India have shown that simply training teachers in the approach or providing the teaching materials alone does not improve learning outcomes. However, when teachers were guided by clear goals, helped to understand data on children’s learning, supported by strong mentors who provided ongoing on-site help, and brought together to share learnings and challenges, learning outcomes improved. Moreover, the research suggests the importance of governments collecting data and using these data in regular review meetings.
Pratham’s TaRL approach has inspired a broader set of programs that use tailored instruction to promote learning. A growing body of evidence suggests that these types of programs that align instruction to students’ current learning levels are among the most effective and cost-effective ways to improve learning. For more information on this research, please see J-PAL’s policy insight on tailored instruction.
From Research to Action
Pratham’s TaRL approach has scaled throughout India and Africa to reach over 60 million students.
While several other delivery models had been tried in the past, starting in 2012, Pratham began to focus on two implementation models:
- Learning camp model: Pratham instructors work directly with children in "Learning Camps." Learning Camps are intensive periods of instructional activity that usually last ten days. Children (generally in grades 3 to 5) are re-grouped according to learning level rather than age or grade for two to three hours per day. Three to five camps are done through the year for a total of 30 to 50 instructional days, often with a gap of roughly ten days between each camp. When they are not in a Learning Camp, children return to their regular grade classes. Learning Camps are carried out during the school day with the permission of local authorities.
- Government partnership model: Government teachers are trained and supported to implement TaRL in their schools. In these models, teachers re-group children in grades 3 to 5 based on learning level for one or two hours per day to focus on basic skills. Usually the program is led by mentors or “leaders of practice” who are part of the government system but have carried out “practice classes” to implement and experience the TaRL approach first-hand. The leaders of practice then train teachers and also provide ongoing, onsite support. Drawing on learning from randomized evaluations in Haryana and Bihar, Pratham helps ensure that teachers receive strong ongoing mentorship support and that monitoring and review systems are integrated into existing educational systems.
Pratham’s efforts to implement these two models at scale, strategically support governments aiming to improve learning, and continuously incorporate learnings from rigorous research have led to the implementation of TaRL programs in many states in India.
Drawing on the success of the TaRL approach in India, governments and non-governmental organizations in Sub-Saharan Africa are adapting and implementing TaRL programs in several countries with technical support from Pratham, J-PAL, and other partners. Since piloting the TaRL approach in 2016, for instance, the Ministry of General Education (MoGE) in Zambia has expanded its Catch Up program to 1,900 schools in three provinces. After the program was first piloted in Nigerian schools in late 2019, TaRL Africa pivoted to supporting home-based learning when the Covid-19 pandemic resulted in school closures from April 2020 to January 2021. Since schools reopened, TaRL has been scaled to more than 800 schools across five states. In Côte d’Ivoire, TaRL Africa is supporting the Ministry of National Education and Literacy (MENA) to deliver and grow the Programme d’Enseignement Ciblé (Program of Targeted Instruction, PEC). Other organizations are working to support governments to scale TaRL-inspired programs in countries across the African continent, including in Botswana, Ghana, Kenya, Madagascar, Niger, Sierra Leone, South Africa, Tanzania, and Uganda.
In 2021, TaRL programming reached over one million children in 12 African countries, and TaRL Africa, which began as a joint venture between J-PAL and Pratham, registered as a Kenyan organization. For more information on TaRL in Sub-Saharan Africa, please visit the TaRL Africa website.
Recent years have seen growing awareness of a global learning crisis–reflected in the transition from the Millennium Development Goals, which focused on school enrollment, to the Sustainable Development Goals, which recognize that this increase in enrollment has not translated into an increase in learning.4 TaRL, along with the broader body of work it helped to catalyze on targeted instruction, has gained global recognition as an effective strategy to improve learning. As policymakers search for solutions, a number of education interventions–including customized learning technology in India, preschool pedagogy in Peru, low-tech interventions targeted at parents during Covid-19 school closures in Botswana, and tutoring programs in the United States–cite the importance of assessing learning levels and targeting instruction to learners.
A number of influential organizations now recognize TaRL as an effective approach to teach foundational skills and address learning loss. Citing TaRL evidence, an independent panel convened by the World Bank, FCDO, and the donor group Building Evidence in Education identified targeted instruction as an intervention for which there is good evidence of cost-effectiveness. The FLN (Foundational Literacy and Numeracy) Hub– a resource hub with guidance on improving children’s foundational literacy and numeracy skills, developed by J-PAL, Unicef, Pratham, and Delivery Associates in collaboration with the World Bank and the Global Partnership for Education–has a standalone section on TaRL. Unicef, drawing on its experience supporting Zambia to implement TaRL, identified Pratham as a key partner for inclusion in the Hub. The World Bank’s 2018 World Development Report cites targeted instruction as a way to support learners from falling behind in school on basic skills.
The TaRL approach has been particularly influential as education policymakers around the world have endeavored to address learning losses resulting from school closures during the Covid-19 pandemic. Researchers at McKinsey estimate that children lost eight months of learning,5 and the proportion of ten-year-olds in low and middle-income countries who could not read a simple story rose from 57 to 70 percent during the pandemic, according to the World Bank.6 In response, the Global Education Evidence Advisory Panel recommended that schools target instruction to students’ learning levels to help them catch up. The World Bank, UNICEF, FCDO, USAID, and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation issued a report calling teaching at the right level “the single most crucial intervention for reversing the decline in learning progress.”
This case study was published in September 2019 and updated in August 2022 to include more information on how the TaRL approach has been adapted and scaled in Africa, and to highlight how this body of research has shifted global thinking on addressing learning loss.
References
Banerjee, Abhijit V., Shawn Cole, Esther Duflo, and Leigh Linden. 2007. "Remedying education: Evidence from two randomized experiments in India." The Quarterly Journal of Economics 122 (3): 1235–1264. https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.122.3.1235.
Banerjee, Abhijit V., Rukmini Banerji, Esther Duflo, Rachel Glennerster, and Stuti Khemani. 2010. “Pitfalls of participatory programs: Evidence from a randomized evaluation in education in India.” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 2 (1): 1–30. http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/pol.2.1.1
Banerjee, Abhijit, Rukmini Banerji, James Berry, Esther Duflo, Harini Kannan, Shobhini Mukherji, Marc Shotland, and Michael Walton. 2016. “Mainstreaming an effective intervention: Evidence from randomized evaluations of ‘Teaching at the Right Level’ in India.” NBER Working Paper No. 22746. https://www.nber.org/papers/w22746.
Banerjee, Abhijit, Rukmini Banerji, James Berry, Esther Duflo, Harini Kannan, Shobhini Mukerji, Marc Shotland, and Michael Walton. 2017. "From proof of concept to scalable policies: challenges and solutions, with an application." Journal of Economic Perspectives 31 (4): 73–102. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.31.4.73
Banerji, Rukmini, and Madhav Chavan. 2016. "Improving literacy and math instruction at scale in India’s primary schools: The case of Pratham’s Read India program." Journal of educational change 17 (4): 453-475.
Banerji Rukmini. 2019. "Banerjee and Duflo's Journey with Pratham." Ideas for India.
Banerjee, Abhijit, Rukmini Banerji, James Berry, Esther Duflo, Harini Kannan, Shobhini Mukherji, Marc Shotland, and Michael Walton. 2016. “Mainstreaming an effective intervention: Evidence from randomized evaluations of “Teaching at the Right Level” in India.” National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. w22746, October 2016.
ASER Centre. 2019. “Annual Status of Education Report (Rural) 2018.” New Delhi: ASER Centre.
Uwezo. 2016. "Are Our Children Learning? Uwezo Uganda 6th Learning Assessment Report." Kampala: Twaweza East Africa.
World Bank. 2018. “World Development Report 2018.” https://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/wdr2018; Bhula, Radhika and John Floretta. 2020. “A Better Education for All During–and After–the COVID-19 Pandemic.” Stanford Social Innovation Review. October 16, 2020.
“Covid learning loss has been a disaster.” The Economist. July 7, 2022. https://www.economist.com/international/2022/07/07/covid-learning-loss-has-been-a-global-disaster
“The State of Global Learning Poverty: 2022 Update.” World Bank, UNESCO, UNICEF, USAID, FCDO, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. June 2022. https://www.unicef.org/reports/state-global-learning-poverty-2022