PDF version

The Impact of Communication Messages on Student Performance in São Paulo, Brazil

Location: Brazil
Timeline:
2016 to 2017
Target Group: 
Parents
Students
Outcome of Interest: 
Enrollment and attendance
Student learning
Intervention Type: 
Digital and mobile
Information
Nudges and reminders
AEA RCT Registration Number: 

Little is known about why communicating with parents about their children’s attendance and grades is effective for raising educational achievement. Researchers, in partnership with the São Paulo Education Secretariat, conducted a randomized evaluation in ninth grade classrooms to investigate the mechanisms driving the effects of communicating with parents on education outcomes. They found that weekly SMS communication had large impacts on student attendance, test scores, and promotion rates, and that these results were primarily driven by messages that increased salience for why monitoring student behavior is important.

Policy Issue 

Despite substantial progress in recent decades towards achieving universal primary enrollment, the quality of schooling often remains low. Poor education outcomes may reflect not only poor infrastructure and teacher performance, but also low family engagement in students’ school lives. A growing body of evidence indicates that informing parents about their children’s attendance and grades can substantially raise educational achievement. However, little is known as to why communicating with parents works. Does information make it easier for parents to monitor their children’s behavior? Alternatively, does information increase parents’ understanding of why monitoring their children’s behavior is important? Understanding the mechanisms behind why communicating with parents is effective will help implementers in developing countries adapt more cost-effective communication strategies that better leverage their limited resources.

Context of the Evaluation 

While more than 98 percent of 7 to 14 year-old Brazilians were enrolled in school as of 2015, Brazilian 15 year-olds scored 121 points below the OECD average on the Math PISA exam—a worldwide study of scholastic performance—implying a two-year lag in math skills. These poor educational outcomes may be partially driven by a lack of parental engagement in their children’s education. According to the 2015 National Survey of Student’s Health, about 25 percent of parents do not know if their children skip classes and only half of parents regularly ask about homework. Furthermore, most school systems do not have real-time information systems to track students’ attendance or school behavior to better communicate this information to parents.

São Paulo, where this evaluation took place, is the richest and most populous state in Brazil. Its education system encompasses the largest number of students in the country—covering approximately 5.3 million primary and middle school pupils as of 2015. However, there are large socioeconomic discrepancies in educational attainment. Wealthy families typically enroll children in higher-quality private schools, while students from disadvantaged backgrounds generally attend public schools. In the study sample, more than 50 percent of households earned less than US$900 per month—equivalent to three times the minimum wage—and roughly 60 percent had not completed high school.

Woman text messaging

Photo: Shutterstock.com

Details of the Intervention 

In partnership with the São Paulo Education Secretariat, researchers conducted a randomized evaluation to understand how different types of communication can affect parents’ beliefs, aspirations, and behavior, as well as students’ behavior and educational outcomes. By alternating the types of messages parents received, researchers investigated the mechanisms underlying the effects of communicating with parents—i.e. whether increasing salience of why attendance is important is more or less effective than directly providing information on student attendance.

Researchers randomly assigned 287 schools in São Paulo to one of five subgroups. Within each subgroup, they randomly assigned parents of ninth grade math students to receive different types of weekly text (SMS) communications that varied along five dimensions:

  • Salience: Parents received messages with statements raising awareness about the importance of school attendance, punctuality, and assignment completion to test whether a general, lower cost form of communication could effectively capture parents’ attention.
  • Individual Information: Parents received messages with information about their child’s attendance, tardiness, and assignment completion to test whether reducing monitoring costs through individualized messages changed parents’ behaviors.
  • Relative Information: Parents received messages with information about their child’s attendance, tardiness, and assignment completion relative to their child’s peers to test whether parents are more affected when they know how their child is performing relative to others in their class.
  • Engagement: Parents received messages with suggestions of non-curricular activities to do with their children to test whether nudges delivered independent of teacher involvement altered parents’ behaviors.
  • Comparison: Parents received no messages.

Researchers further randomized parents to receive text messages that varied by frequency, delivery time, consistency of delivery time, and that encouraged interactions between parents and children. Parents received text messages only if their children’s math teachers filled in a web platform with information on attendance, tardiness, and assignment completion that week. The program ran for six months of the academic year, from June to December 2016.

Results and Policy Lessons 

Weekly SMS communication with parents had large impacts on student attendance, test scores, and promotion rates. These results were primarily driven by messages that increased salience for why monitoring student behavior is important.

Student Performance: Attendance increased for children of parents who received information or salience messages by 2.1 percentage points (2.4 percent), compared to an attendance rate of 87.5 percent in the comparison group or equivalent to approximately five additional classes per academic year. Weekly communication also increased students’ math GPAs and math test scores by 0.09 standard deviations and 0.10 standard deviations, respectively. Students of parents who received weekly communication were 3.2 percentage points (3.4 percent) more likely to be promoted to the next grade, compared to approximately 94 percent of students in the comparison group. Researchers suggest that salience messages primarily drove these communication effects, improving outcomes by 89 to 126 percent of the effects of information.

Parental Beliefs and Engagement: Parents who received messages were more engaged with their children than parents who did not receive any message and were more likely to ask their children about school, incentivize studying, and express aspirations for their children to attend college. These impacts were larger for parents who were initially less attentive to their children. Salience effects on students’ GPAs and information effects on students’ math test scores were almost 0.20 standard deviations higher for inattentive parents, compared to attentive parents.

In contrast, the messages did not necessarily improve parental beliefs about their children’s academic performance. Salience messages made pessimistic parents—i.e. parents who underestimated their children’s performance at baseline—more accurate about their children’s math GPA. However, information messages decreased pessimistic parents’ accuracy regarding their children’s math attendance. These results suggest that parental attention and beliefs do not play a central role in behavior change leading to better school performance. Rather, parents’ engagement seems to be the key mediating factor.

Information Delivery: Higher-frequency communication and varied delivery times increased the impact of communication on student performance. More frequent messages increased students’ math and Portuguese GPAs. However, sending more than two messages per week had no additional benefit on attendance. Researchers found suggestive evidence that encouraging parents to engage with their children could potentially have larger effects on educational achievement than information and salience messages.

Effects by Gender: Male students experienced larger impacts from the communication messages on attendance, GPA, promotion rates, and math test scores compared to female students. Researchers observed that communication also had a larger effect on male students’ parents’ behavior and aspirations.

Additional results forthcoming.

Cunha, Nina, Guilherme Lichand, Ricardo Madeira, and Eric Bettinger. “What is It About Communicating With Parents?” Working Paper, October 2017. Available at: https://cepa.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/cunha_cover_paper1.pdf.