HCDI Request for Proposals

Overview

The J-PAL North America’s US Health Care Delivery Initiative (HCDI) is calling for randomized evaluations of strategies that aim to make health care delivery in the United States more efficient, effective, and equitable. 

We particularly welcome proposals that incorporate research questions involving racial equity. Please see Researching Racial Equity for an overview of our research priorities.

Types of Proposals

Full Research Projects

Full research projects are typically awarded $150,000 to $250,000, with a maximum budget of $400,000. The award period may be up to three years. A full project proposal is one where applicants: 

• Can propose a clear and well-developed research question, with references to previous literature
• Can provide detailed randomization design, power calculations, and can indicate outcomes of interest
• Can provide proof of commitment from partner organizations (in the form of letters of support)

Full project proposals may be submitted for an ongoing study that has already begun without J-PAL North America funding.

Pilot Studies 

Pilot studies may be awarded a maximum of $50,000. The award period may be up to three years.  A pilot proposal is one where applicants: 

• Seek to answer a particular research question but the design and implementation require further testing and development before a full project launches
• Can clearly explain how the pilot will lead to a randomized evaluation in the future, although random assignment does not necessarily need to occur during the pilot
• Aim to facilitate access to administrative data for designing or conducting an RCT

Research Management Support

Researchers are strongly encouraged to apply for Research Management Support (RMS) when submitting their proposals. RMS provides short-term, customized, and expert support to help design and launch a randomized evaluation for researchers in the J-PAL network. Support may include activities such as project management, stakeholder management, technical support, and staff recruitment. To apply for RMS, please fill out this sheet and submit with your RFP application materials. You do not need to alter your budget when applying for RMS. The value does not count towards the funding limits referenced in other sections of these instructions. More information can be found on the website, or by contacting [email protected].  

Travel/proposal development grants

Researchers may be awarded a maximum of $5,000 for one year. Grants are to be used for early-stage research activities which may include travel, exploring access to administrative data, or other costs incurred while conducting fieldwork. Travel/proposal development grants are paid by direct reimbursement to the PI and cannot cover any activity that requires review by an IRB. All J-PAL NA travel/development grants are reviewed and funded by the Social Policy Research Initiative (SPRI). Please review the instructions under the "Application Documents" section, and submit materials to [email protected].

Add-on funding

Add-on-funding may be awarded to projects previously funded by any J-PAL North America initiative. Funding requests are capped at $400,000 minus the amount of all funding previously awarded to the evaluation (i.e. if a proposal previously received $150,000 from J-PAL North America, add-on-funding is capped at $250,000). The award period may be up to three years. Add-on-funding proposals may seek to:

• Add additional sites or treatment arms to an implemented evaluation
• Support additional activities on ongoing or past RCTs, such as follow-ups to measure long-term effects
• Extend the project timeline or cover additional costs due to implementation challenges

Eligibility Criteria 

Proposal Eligibility

J-PAL North America funds randomized evaluations, or randomized controlled trials (RCTs), in the United States. These include: 

• Randomized evaluations of policies or programs
• Randomized correspondence or audit studies (ex: "Systemic Discrimination Among Large U.S. Employers")
• Re-analyses of past instances of randomization (ex: “When Scale and Replication Work: Learning from Summer Youth Employment Experiments”)
• Lab experiments, only when part of a larger evaluation involving a real-world intervention (see above criteria). Pure lab experiments are not eligible for J-PAL North America funding. 

J-PAL North America will fund non-randomized work under pilot and travel/development funding (see grant criteria below) if there is a clear link to how it will lead to an RCT.  

The same proposal (or different versions of the same proposal) may not be submitted to multiple J-PAL North America RFPs simultaneously unless given explicit permission to do so. 

J-PAL North America has a “no wrong door policy” for Initiative RFP submissions; in instances where a proposal topic is eligible to be submitted to more than one open RFP, researchers can submit to one relevant Initiative, and J-PAL staff will vet and redirect proposals to other open and relevant Initiatives for review as needed.

Researcher Eligibility  

J-PAL affiliates, J-PAL post-doctoral fellows, and researchers invited by J-PAL North America to participate in the initiative (invited researchers) are eligible to apply for funding of any type. Applicants may submit a maximum of three proposals per 12-month period to a single initiative. PI and co-PI status are counted towards this limit.

Graduate Students

To apply, graduate students must meet the following criteria: 

• They have a J-PAL affiliate or invited researcher on their thesis committee. The researcher does not need to be based at the same university as the student..
• Pre-thesis PhD students may apply if they anticipate an affiliate or invited researcher will be on their thesis committee and the affiliate will supervise the proposed project.
• To apply for full funding, graduate students must have previously received a grant from J-PAL for the same evaluation or have documented evidence of successful piloting activities. Note, for graduate students the total amount of funding they may receive across time is capped at $50,000 per initiative, regardless of the number of projects funded.

Timeline

DATES FOR CURRENT RFP Cycle: 

October 2nd, 2024 — RFP is issued
January 7th, 2025 — Proposal Submission Deadline
Week of March 24th, 2025 — Awards Announced

Off-cycle proposals will face the same scrutiny as proposals submitted during the RFP round and must include a justification for off-cycle submission. Examples of acceptable justifications may include a pressing policy or program implementation timeline (ex. implementation must align with the academic year) or other constraints outside of the research team’s control. Acceptable justifications do not include timeline changes under the research team’s control or other internal factors.

Relevance to Public Policy and Issues of Poverty

• Does the proposal make the case for how answering the proposed research question and/or evaluating the proposed intervention has the potential to generate benefits for the following economically marginalized populations? 
  • People who are low-income or living in poverty
  • People who have risk factors associated with falling into poverty
  • People who identify as members of racial/ethnic groups who are at greater risk of living in or falling into poverty due to economic marginalization produced through structural racism in North America, such as Black, Indigenous, and Latinx populations. 
• Is the proposal addressing a pressing public policy issue in North America? How is this policy issue relevant to one or more of the populations described above?
  • Does the policy issue have a significant or disproportionate impact on low-income and/or economically marginalized populations?
• Is the intervention designed to improve or increase access to resources and choices for low-income and/or economically marginalized populations?
• Is the policy issue is one that, if unaddressed, could cause people to fall into poverty?
• Does the policy intervention relate to issues of structural racism that are specific to economically marginalized racial/ethnic groups in the North America context?
• Will lessons learned from this study have broader relevance or applications for policy or decision-making beyond this test case?

You may find examples of evaluations previously funded by the Health Care Delivery Initiative here.